Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Service Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sergeant, A.
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

When Do Customer Contact Employees Satisfy Customers?

Andrew Sergeant

Stephen Frenkel

Australian Graduate School of Management

Previous service workplace research has indicated the impact of supportive supervisors, teams, other departments, and technology on employee satisfaction and organizational commitment. These variables in turn have been shown to influence customer contact employee behavior and customer satisfaction. In this article, the authors explore how these variables relate to employees’ capacity to satisfy customers. Using a structural equation modeling methodology, the authors found that in terms of direct effects on employees’ capacity to satisfy customers, some variables (e.g., other department support) were more important than others (e.g., technology). Some variables (e.g., other department support) had a direct effect on employees’ capacity to satisfy customers, some had a mediated effect (e.g., supervisor support), and some had both a direct and mediated effect (e.g., technology). The capacity of employees to satisfy customers is strongly dependent on a set of mutually supportive variables.

Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 18-34 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109467050031002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
L. C. Harris and E. Ogbonna
Service Sabotage: A Study of Antecedents and Consequences
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 1, 2006; 34(4): 543 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
M. R. Testa and M. G. Ehrhart
Service Leader Interaction Behaviors: Comparing Employee and Manager Perspectives
Group Organization Management, October 1, 2005; 30(5): 456 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
I. N. Lings and G. E. Greenley
Measuring Internal Market Orientation
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2005; 7(3): 290 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
L. C. Harris and E. Ogbonna
Exploring Service Sabotage: The Antecedents, Types and Consequences of Frontline, Deviant, Antiservice Behaviors
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2002; 4(3): 163 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]