Journal of Service Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 162-180 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1094670505279418
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Crime and Punishment

Examining Customers’ Responses to Service Organizations’ Penalties

Young "Sally" K. Kim

Shenandoah University

Amy K. Smith

George Washington University

Service organizations often use various types of penalties without fully understanding the effects on customers’ evaluations. Because customers’ responses to penalties are usually negative, it is important for service organizations to properly administer and manage penalties. However, little is currently known about how customers view such "punishments." This study develops an integrated framework to explain customers’ responses to penalties based on concepts from attribution theory, social justice theory, and expectancy disconfirmation. The study examines the effects of penalty attributes (severity, flexibility, adequacy of an explanation), attributions (i.e., causal inference), perceived justice, disconfirmation, and emotion on customers’ evaluations of penalties imposed by service organizations. This research uses a cross-sectional survey design and collects data online using the critical incident technique. The results show that penalty attributes, attributions, perceived justice, and negative emotion have significant effects on customers’ responses to penalties. The study provides useful guidelines to help service organizations manage penalties.

Key Words: penalty • perceived justice • attribution • emotion • disconfirmation • customer dissatisfaction • service


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?