This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1094670508319091v1 11/1/91    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schoefer, K. Articles by Diamantopoulos, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Role of Emotions in Translating Perceptions of (In)Justice into Postcomplaint Behavioral Responses

University of Vienna

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: klaus.schoefer{at}univie.ac.at.

	Abstract

There is widespread recognition in the literature that perceived (in)justice plays an important role in driving postcomplaint behavioral responses to service recovery experiences. However, this literature has evolved with little cross-reference to emotion research. This is problematic because much of psychology research has argued that emotion is the central mechanism through which a sense of (in)justice is translated into subsequent behavior. The current study seeks to address this issue by explicitly considering the role of perceived (in)justice in the elicitation of consumer emotions following service recovery encounters. Specifically, using survey data, the role of emotions in translating perceptions of (in)justice into subsequent postcomplaint behaviors (e.g., repurchase intention, negative word-of-mouth communication and third-party action) is investigated. Results provide empirical evidence for the contention that emotions act as mediators of the relationship between perceived justice and postcomplaint behaviors. These findings have significant implications for the theory and practice of service recovery management.

First published on June 9, 2008, doi:10.1177/1094670508319091

Journal of Service Research 2008;11:91.

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?